Scope
Client brief & research questions
Translate the assignment into a research plan with your team’s instructions.
An agreed approachApply your research criteria and templates with live biopharma intelligence. Keep client working files current between readouts.
The guidance limits abrocitinib funding to moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis after inadequate response, intolerance or contraindication to at least one systemic therapy. Additional prescribing criteria apply.
View source 2 January 2024Real source evidence.
Illustrative team files and assessments.
| Row | A | B |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Client model input | Assessment |
| 2 | Disease severity | Moderate-to-severe AD¹ |
| 3 | Prior systemic therapy | Not recordedPrior-treatment criteria apply¹ |
| 4 | Eligible population | All moderate-to-severe ADRecalculate using the funding criteria¹ |
Singapore · Access assignment
Reviewer checks before the next readoutCheck the full criteria against the source and validate the population inputs before finalizing the client slides.
Give Maven an example deliverable and your research instructions to build a workflow you can refine and reuse.
Client brief & research questions
Translate the assignment into a research plan with your team’s instructions.
An agreed approachClient materials & data connectors
Combine project context with live biopharma intelligence.
A shared evidence baseYour analytical framework
Compare findings, check claims, and retain the source quotes for review.
A sourced recommendationYour example Word, Excel, or PowerPoint
Build the new analysis using your example’s structure and style.
Your client’s deliverableEvery finding stays tied to its source, so a partner can check the analysis the way they would check an associate’s.
See each asset, company, or trial against the same criteria in a Smart Table, with the evidence beside each answer.
Open the Document Grid to see what was extracted from each publication or client file, with the supporting quote.
Built-in fact checking flags unsupported conclusions and missing evidence before anything goes into the deliverable.
Map the landscape, benchmark target profiles, and organize the evidence around the client’s strategic question.
Test the asset narrative against clinical evidence, competing programs, access conditions, and client materials.
Compare local HTA guidance and funding criteria. Bring your primary research into the interpretation.
Monitor the agreed scope and refresh standing trackers and briefings in the engagement’s format.
Relevant evidence updates the access tracker and briefing.
Connect your assistant through MCP, or send monitoring findings into your own systems with the API and webhooks.
Explore integrationsSOC 2 Type II, encryption, and no model training on customer data.
Review securityYes. Supply an example deliverable, your research instructions, and the project scope. Maven’s agent can build a workflow around them. Refine the steps and use it to produce future Word documents, PowerPoint presentations, Excel workbooks, and charts.
Yes. Bring client documents, internal research, and custom data connectors into the assignment. The agent uses that context alongside Maven’s live intelligence, while your team directs the interpretation and the deliverable.
Review the comparison in Smart Tables, the extracted findings in Document Grids, and the source quotes behind cited claims. Built-in fact checking helps identify unsupported conclusions and evidence gaps before the work goes into the client deliverable.