Investigate a candidate
Give the Research Agent the candidate and follow-up questions for a deeper assessment.
Explore the Research AgentResearch drugs, companies, and trials against consistent criteria, with evidence and open questions beside each answer.
Add a column for clinical differentiation, evidence gaps, or fit with your target product profile.
Our criterion: reduce exacerbations, with quality-of-life differentiation assessed separately.
The exacerbation result addresses our stated criterion. MATINEE did not establish a quality-of-life or symptom benefit.
“Between-group differences in measures of health-related quality of life and symptoms were not significant”Sciurba et al. · NEJM 2025 · Abstract, Results ↗
Compare dupilumab and mepolizumab. Where does the clinical evidence support differentiation?
Scroll across to compare all columns →
| Drug & mechanism | Which outcomes improved? | Where is the evidence limited? | What should we investigate next? |
|---|---|---|---|
| DupilumabIL-4Rα antibody | Fewer exacerbations and better lung function. BOREASNOTUS | Quality-of-life results differ between the two trials.Trial-specific findings | How consistent is the benefit across endpoints and patient groups?Compare the primary publications |
| MepolizumabIL-5 antibody | Fewer exacerbations and a longer time to the first event. MATINEE | No significant quality-of-life or symptom benefit.Direct evidence · MATINEE | Does an exacerbation benefit address the team’s target product profile?Apply your assessment criteria |
Give the Research Agent the candidate and follow-up questions for a deeper assessment.
Explore the Research AgentExtract the same details across publications, abstracts, or diligence documents in a Document Grid.
Explore Document GridsBuild a sourced report with the rationale for each candidate and the questions still open.
Explore Report Builder